<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Edward Riche</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edwardriche.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edwardriche.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:40:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Vintage</title>
		<link>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/12/vintage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/12/vintage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwardriche.com/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The simultaneous arrival of two subsequent vintages, 2008 and 2009, of wines from a grower and maker in Burgundy, demands comparisons. Thierry Glantenay, with holdings in Volnay and Pommard is new to me but debuts near the top of my charts.  From what I&#8217;ve tasted thus far, the ready-to-drink simple &#8220;bourgognes&#8221; (young or declassified vines, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The simultaneous arrival of two subsequent vintages, 2008 and 2009, of wines from a grower and maker in Burgundy, demands comparisons. Thierry Glantenay, with holdings in Volnay and Pommard is new to me but debuts near the top of my charts.  From what I&#8217;ve tasted thus far, the ready-to-drink simple &#8220;bourgognes&#8221; (young or declassified vines, batches not worthy of higher designation), we are in the glorious realm of small producer Burgundy, real terroirist stuff.   Both vintages have polish, both have red berry notes, raspberry and, a little less so, partridgeberry. The 09, though, has a dollop of black fruit on top of this, like ripe plum.  The profile of a the 08 is stony, the 09 earthy.  Gravelly things in the 08 versus fungal, sous bois things in the 09.  There is something more &#8220;sappy&#8221; in the 09s and more &#8220;leafy&#8221; in the 08s.  2009 is generally rated the &#8220;better&#8221; year but I prefer to think of them only as different. (Some vintages are utter busts, some are exceptionally good but most are better considered an account of a particular time at a particular place.)</p>
<p>There is no intrusive oak in these examples so I venture they were raised in older barrels.  The 09 is, predictably, closed and needs a few hours in the decanter to reveal itself.  When opened the 09 had a faint whiff of cabbagey ferment, like good beaujolais cru, that blew off.  I find that tends be a good sign in best wines made from pinot noir and gamay,  Some would say it&#8217;s a flaw, indicating the presence of excess <a href="http://saignee.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/day-16-sulfur/">mercaptans</a>.  I speculate wildly that the correct, judicious measure of that might be an essential thing, merely indicating less intrusive making. I know mercaptans are too &#8220;heavy&#8221; to &#8220;blow off&#8221; but something is happening.</p>
<div id="attachment_790" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-790" title="volnay_village1" src="http://www.edwardriche.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/volnay_village1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="216" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Volnay</p></div>
<p>There is nothing grandiose or obvious about these wines.  They are clean and lithe and subtle.  They don&#8217;t show themselves without the context of food.  I shall be accused of abject flakiness but I think this kind of drink only finds its full expression at the convivial table.  They are not flamboyant enough for a restaurant list other than the simplest bistro.  They are suited to home-cooked fare shared with family and friends. The Volnay Premier Crus, after a few years keeping, will have a lot more glamour in the glass.</p>
<p>Skin the rabbits.</p>
<p>Addendum: Another sampling of the 2008 Bourgogne (from my relatively cool cellar) with attention to evolution in the air demonstrates the wine needs, at the very least, 2 to 3 hours in the decanter.  Transformation over that period was remarkable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/12/vintage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Globe Review</title>
		<link>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/11/globe-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/11/globe-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwardriche.com/?p=778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the daily review, Tue., Nov. 22 Easy to Like lives up to the promise of its title reviewed by kevin chong From Tuesday&#8217;s Globe and Mail Published Monday, Nov. 21, 2011 6:00AM EST The satirical subjects of Edward Riche’s witty and stylish novel Easy to Like are, at first glance, an utter mismatch: wine-making in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4 id="articlelabel">the daily review, Tue., Nov. 22</h4>
<h2 id="articletitle">Easy to Like lives up to the promise of its title</h2>
<h4>reviewed by kevin chong</h4>
<h4>From Tuesday&#8217;s Globe and Mail</h4>
<h5>Published <time pubdate="" datetime="2011-11-21 06:00 -0500">Monday, Nov. 21, 2011 6:00AM EST</time></h5>
<p>The satirical subjects of Edward Riche’s witty and stylish novel <em>Easy to Like</em> are, at first glance, an utter mismatch: wine-making in California and the bureaucratic clockwork that keeps the mandated showbiz of the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. a-ticking. Riche, the author of the novels <em>Rare Birds</em> and <em>The Nine Planets</em>, bridges the terroirs of <em>Sideways</em> and <em>The Newsroom</em> through his protagonist Elliot Jonson, a Newfoundland-born Hollywood screenwriter and aspiring winemaker, whose life work, in a sense, boils down to making people like what he makes.</p>
<div>
<aside id="articlesidebar">
<div><img src="http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/01343/EasyToLike_jpg_1343841cl-3.jpg" alt="Easy to Like. By Edward Riche. Anansi, 293 pages, $29.95" width="219" height="335" /></p>
<div>Easy to Like. By Edward Riche. Anansi, 293 pages, $29.95</div>
</div>
<p>When he first appears to the reader, Elliot’s life in California is imploding. The middle-aged screenwriter’s wife has left him for their housekeeper; his son, embittered by his childhood as an actor, is incarcerated on drug charges. The prospects for his most recent movie idea, <em>Nailed</em>, is … well, screwed. “They don’t think <em>Brokeback</em> meets <em>Passion of the Christ</em> has an audience,” his agent explains. “They don’t buy the whole gay Jesus thing.”</p>
<p>Even worse, Elliot’s actual passion project, a winery in Santa Barbara, is short on cash, which prompts an associate to suggest producing a populist zinfandel. Faced with a choice between purveying inferior product and insolvency, Elliot instead flees to France.</p>
<p>When a near-expired passport keeps him in Toronto, Elliot’s channel-surfing inspires him to call in a favour and land the No. 2 position at the Mother Corp, which “did possess a certain charm in its inability to be slick.” There, he finds his Hollywood-bred instincts to find an audience at all costs compromised by the public broadcaster’s fuzzily defined requirements to reflect Canada.</p>
<p>One show titled <em>Banff 911</em>, a regionally representative drama meant to draw in the entire family, has ratings that are “[in] the range of the survey’s error.” Eventually, Elliot’s sole hit will come from a late-night show hosted by a fallen TV star that the newly appointed exec finds living in a ravine.</p>
<p>Riche, the St. John’s-based screenwriter who has worked on Canadian productions like <em>The Boys of St. Vincent</em> and <em>Dooley Gardens</em>, has great fun at the idea of bureaucrats creating entertainment. The CBC that he lampoons, neglecting to mention shows like <em>Hockey Night in Canada</em> and <em>Dragons’ Den</em>, presents a patronizingly high-minded reflection of the country: “It’s a Tim Hortons nation,” one character observes. “Who should expect a population whose favourite food is Kraft Dinner to go in for documentaries about Stockhausen?”</p>
<p>While smartly written, <em>Easy to Like</em> often feels too casually constructed and imagined (but not quite rambling enough to qualify as “picaresque”). The motivation for Elliot to find work at CBC is hardly present, the passages about wine production are mainly inaccessible to those who aren’t oenophiles, and the book presents a number of potentially amusing storylines – the cult next to the winery, in which worshippers wear loaves of bread as shoes; a wiretapping indictment involving major Hollywood players; a U.S. Department of Agriculture investigation into French vines smuggled into California by Elliot – but leaves them all unripened.</p>
<p>On another level, this insouciant approach gives the reader enough breathing space to appreciate Riche’s gift for withering turns of phrase. Elliot, who is as commanding and detached in Toronto as he is incompetent and over-the-hill in Los Angeles, attends one CBC meeting where “[nothing] of substance was put forward, but it was all said in the ornate poetry of management non-speak.”</p>
<p>As a title, <em>Easy to Like</em> presents one fat target for a reviewer, but the book lives up to its promise by offering a spry, light-hearted defence of cultivated taste and an artist’s prerogative in the face of entertainment by committee.</p>
<p><em>Kevin Chong’s most recent book, the novel </em>Beauty Plus Pity<em>, has just been published</em></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p><em>Grateful for the good notice. The &#8220;unripened&#8221; comment is astute in the context of the novel&#8217;s protagonist&#8217;s distaste for wine made from overripe or &#8220;deliquescent&#8221; fruit.  I endeavored not to explicate every point in the plot, to let the reader take up the clues and figure them out for themselves. I recently read the following from Chateau Beaucastel&#8217;s Marc Perrin, &#8220;When you are young and you&#8217;re making wines that are meant to age, you put as much as possible into the wine, thinking the more at the beginning, the more will be there at the end . But when you have experience and less doubt, you can bottle the wines with balance, because you realize balance is the key.&#8221;<br />
</em></p>
</aside>
<footer></footer>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/11/globe-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contrary</title>
		<link>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/contrary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/contrary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwardriche.com/?p=748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a sometimes fan of The New Yorker&#8217;s lead literary critic James Wood.  A review of his put me on to Geoff Dyer&#8217;s &#8220;Jeff in Venice, Death in Varanasi&#8221;,  a novel I enjoyed.  I also thought highly of Alan Hollinghurst&#8217;s &#8220;The Line of Beauty&#8221;.  But in The New Yorker of October 17th, 2011 Woods [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a sometimes fan of The New Yorker&#8217;s lead literary critic <a href="http://www.urnews.ca/2010/04/wood-in-woods/">James Wood</a>.  A review of his put me on to Geoff Dyer&#8217;s &#8220;Jeff in Venice, Death in Varanasi&#8221;,  a novel I enjoyed.  I also thought highly of Alan Hollinghurst&#8217;s &#8220;The Line of Beauty&#8221;.  But in The New Yorker of <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2011/10/17/111017crbo_books_wood">October 17th, 2011</a> Woods commends Hollinghurst for just the sort of prose that I complained about in my post here of <a href="http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/09/dis-like/">September 17</a>. <em> </em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;In his second novel, The Folding Star” (1994), Hollinghurst described the experience of watching the Wimbledon tennis tournament on television, on a warm summer’s day, with the windows open. Occasionally, a plane could be heard outside: “the sonic wallow of a plane distancing in slow gusts above.” Again, the power flows from nouns and adjectives placed in unusual combinations—the slight paradox of “slow gusts” (a gust is usually rapid) and the almost onomatopoeic “sonic wallow,” which truly slows the sentence down.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Coming from this gale-punished place, &#8220;slow gusts&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work for me precisely because it doesn&#8217;t make sense.  And &#8220;sonic wallow&#8221; surely does &#8220;slow the sentence down&#8221;, but I believe it is because of the hiccup it induces in the normal process of comprehension.  It is to me a whole bunch of <strong>writing</strong>. It is also some of the most lauded prose of our time so my distaste puts me in a tiny minority.  And I&#8217;ve been guilty of being more overwrought and less precise myself. The construction &#8220;a plane distancing&#8221; I love.</p>
<div id="attachment_750" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 452px"><img class="size-full wp-image-750   " title="venice" src="http://www.edwardriche.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/venice.jpg" alt="" width="442" height="332" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Ed and Andrew in Venice</p></div>
<p>Something else now, some more grousing.  Readers today seem to love characters whose inner lives are in constant view, who are in an almost continual state of introspection and self reflection.  These characters study their own actions rather than responding, as I believe we mostly do, by reflex and rote.  I am up every night at 3 am for a good hour of painful and mostly fruitless rumination and never regard myself and revisit things to nearly the degree most characters I read these days do.  These characters don&#8217;t have enough &#8220;present&#8221; for me.</p>
<p>I have the sensation of being led, by hand, as one would a child when I&#8217;m told, rather than left to determine for myself, what motivates a character&#8217;s actions. And if that character is telling me what they think at least let me suspect they might be lying to themselves.  (One novel I read, and it was entirely interior, where the character possessed what I took for plausible self awareness was John Lanchester&#8217;s <a href="http://us.penguingroup.com/static/rguides/us/mr_phillips.html">Mr. Phillips</a>.)</p>
<p>Again I believe this puts me at odds with most readers out there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same for wine, if I&#8217;m led by the hand, I don&#8217;t enjoy it so much.  I&#8217;ve learned that if a bottle gets rave reviews and high marks from one of the critics  that &#8220;score&#8221; wines it will be too obvious for me.</p>
<p>ADDENDUM: Woods piece in the November 7, 2011 New Yorker, concerning what personal libraries say and do not about their owners is terrific.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/contrary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dutch Waggoner and Patricia Franchini</title>
		<link>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/dutch-waggoner-and-patricia-franchini/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/dutch-waggoner-and-patricia-franchini/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwardriche.com/?p=729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They can&#8217;t properly be called &#8220;cameos&#8221;&#8230;.  but in a form of homage I borrowed character names from movies (and to lesser degree other works of art) I&#8217;ve loved and salted them throughout &#8220;Easy to Like&#8221;.   I won&#8217;t list those characters, some of them small, some of them even off screen, from films like &#8220;Chinatown&#8221; and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can&#8217;t properly be called &#8220;cameos&#8221;&#8230;.  but in a form of homage I borrowed character names from movies (and to lesser degree other works of art) I&#8217;ve loved and salted them throughout &#8220;Easy to Like&#8221;.   I won&#8217;t list those characters, some of them small, some of them even off screen, from films like &#8220;Chinatown&#8221; and &#8220;Fargo&#8221;; that would spoil the fun.  I didn&#8217;t expect anyone to make much of the fact that Elliot changes his name to from Johnston to <a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/books/7307993/masques-of-beauty-and-blackness.thtml">Jonson</a>. Nobody mentioning the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTjsOzeIpc0">TVC-15 </a>reference makes me feel old.</p>
<p>A couple of names from The Pat Hobby Stories do make proper, if anachronistic cameos, playing a writer and a director just as they did in Scott Fitzgerald&#8217;s taut and hilarious original.</p>
<p>I visited Fitzgerald&#8217;s last residence when I was in Los Angeles, researching some of my novel&#8217;s geography.  It is now completely obscured from view by a high hedge, likely because of gawkers like myself.  Yes, street addresses too, have walk-ons in the novel.  The home of Charlie Chaplin is there.  The sight of a drunken Herman Mankiewicz car crash got cut. It was a G.P.S.apalooza in the hills.</p>
<div id="attachment_731" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 430px"><img class="size-full wp-image-731" title="jean seberg" src="http://www.edwardriche.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/jean-seberg1.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Jean Seberg</p></div>
<p>Okay &#8230; one clue &#8230; that&#8217;s Patricia Franchini above.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/dutch-waggoner-and-patricia-franchini/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Jobs Jobs Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/steve-jobs-jobs-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/steve-jobs-jobs-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 13:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwardriche.com/?p=704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bookery, the only independent bookstore in St. John&#8217;s has closed its doors.  It was one of those terrific squat little shops where you always came away with titles other than those you&#8217;d sought. Now the downtown of this booming burgh is without a place to buy new literature.  There&#8217;s nowhere to see a film [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bookery, the only independent bookstore in St. John&#8217;s has closed its doors.  It was one of those terrific squat little shops where you always came away with titles other than those you&#8217;d sought. Now the downtown of this booming burgh is without a place to buy new literature.  There&#8217;s nowhere to see a film either.</p>
<div id="attachment_705" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 243px"><img class="size-full wp-image-705   " title="bookery" src="http://www.edwardriche.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/bookery.jpg" alt="" width="233" height="149" /><p class="wp-caption-text">first Marconi, now this</p></div>
<p>At the same time, against the odds, CBC television has produced and is airing a brilliant new show, &#8220;Michael: Tuesdays and Thursdays&#8221;.  (It&#8217;s the sort of show &#8220;Easy to Like&#8221; said the CBC, with its middlebrow branding, could no longer make.) Nobody is watching it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Numbers&#8221; are down all over.  Neither noisy 3-D extravaganzas nor small pictures for grown-ups got the audiences the film biz expected this year.  With the exception of &#8220;events&#8221; in Chimpanzee telly (a new Chimp to lead &#8220;Two and a Half Men&#8221; for instance) fewer people are glaring at the box.</p>
<p>What are they doing instead?  Are they in the sylvan hills gathering mushrooms? Opting to stay in bed for a morning fuck?  Perhaps they&#8217;re whittling or teaching themselves to play the harmonica?</p>
<p>No, they are watching and playing with their smart phones.  Where people once carted a pulp novel or a magazine along to wait for their Toyota to be serviced, or their flight to depart, they now have their phone. They can sort of read stuff, tweet and update their status (shouldn&#8217;t their status always be &#8220;updating my status&#8221;).  They can look to see whether a cheque has cleared.  They can survey the menu of a restaurant they are considering visiting.  They can read fudged and planted online reviews of the fare there.  They can play a game with blinking lights.  That is what they are doing.</p>
<p>They already vibrate, once they come fitted with a fleshy socket, smart phones will pretty much do it all.</p>
<p>On several occasions I have heard people say, with conviction, &#8220;I love my IPhone.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to bore myself with my middle-aged prefacing of things, like &#8220;ten years ago &#8230;&#8221;.  &#8220;Ten years ago there was that little traffic you could have played street hockey on Kings Bridge on a Saturday morning.&#8221;</p>
<p>But who could have imagined, ten years ago, that people would be so engaged with, and entranced by, their phones.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="281"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wKiIroiCvZ0?version=3&#038;feature=oembed"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wKiIroiCvZ0?version=3&#038;feature=oembed" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="281" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Addendum</p>
<p>http://arts.nationalpost.com/2011/10/14/lynn-coady-i-would-like-to-marry-my-smartphone/</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/steve-jobs-jobs-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Able Seaman Keith Chebucto</title>
		<link>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/able-seaman-keith-chebucto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/able-seaman-keith-chebucto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 10:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwardriche.com/?p=700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Easy to Like By Edward Riche (House of Anansi Press) by Lindsay Rainingbirde Elliot Jonson can’t catch a break. Edward Riche’s newest protagonist boasts a stagnant screenwriting career, an estranged son and newly-homosexual ex-wife, and a passion (but lack of skill) for wine-making. Bitter with his unaccommodating life, dodging debts and caught up in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="StoryHeader">
<div>
<h1>Easy to Like</h1>
<h2>By Edward Riche (House of Anansi Press)</h2>
<p><cite>by <a href="http://www.thecoast.ca/halifax/ArticleArchives?author=2029298">Lindsay Rainingbird</a></cite>e <a title="" href="http://www.thecoast.ca/imager/easy-to-like/b/original/2744828/eb92/easytolike.jpg" rel="contentImg_gal-2744827"> <img src="http://www.thecoast.ca/imager/easy-to-like/b/big/2744828/eb92/easytolike.jpg" alt="easytolike.jpg" width="440" height="232" /> </a></p>
</div>
</div>
<p>Elliot Jonson can’t catch a break. Edward Riche’s newest protagonist boasts a stagnant screenwriting career, an estranged son and newly-homosexual ex-wife, and a passion (but lack of skill) for wine-making. Bitter with his unaccommodating life, dodging debts and caught up in a burgeoning scandal, Elliot moves to escape to France but finds himself detained in Toronto&#8212;purgatory for showbiz minds&#8212;where he manages to bluff his way to the top of the CBC. <em>Easy to Like</em> is just that and more, Riche’s prose is astute and bitingly comic in its depictions of Canada and the average Canadian viewer. Although his lack of concern for plot points may alienate some readers, the real pleasure comes from his richness of characters, ridiculous situations, and surprisingly believable comedic timing. Elliot’s life is a comedy of errors that we applaud with one hand, the other patting ourselves on the back for being&#8212;as credit-loving Canadians&#8212;such great inspiration.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Author <em>Edward Riche </em>is coming to Halifax to host a wine dinner and read from his new book <em>Easy to Like</em> on Oct. 23 at Bistro Le Coq.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll be tasting some of the delicious wines that featured in the novel so it should be terrific fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/able-seaman-keith-chebucto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Aunt Nance</title>
		<link>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/my-aunt-nancy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/my-aunt-nancy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 23:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwardriche.com/?p=677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Aunt Nancy (Nance to family) Riche died Saturday, October 1, from complications of heart surgery.  She was 66.  We were close.  I can remember her babysitting and spoiling me (Academy Performance with Chicken and Chips from Marty&#8217;s).  She was overflowing with love of, and pride in, all her many nieces and nephews. My siblings [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Aunt Nancy (Nance to family) Riche died Saturday, October 1, from complications of heart surgery.  She was 66.  We were close.  I can remember her babysitting and spoiling me (Academy Performance with Chicken and Chips from Marty&#8217;s).  She was overflowing with love of, and pride in, all her many nieces and nephews. My siblings and I saw her at least once a week, my father and she visited daily.  Maybe because she was always so ebullient and youthful in outlook (even as she pushed her body into early decline) she sometimes seemed more an older sister than an Aunt &#8230; but she liked being <em>Aunt</em> Nance.</p>
<div id="attachment_682" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 453px"><img class="size-full wp-image-682 " title="nancy" src="http://www.edwardriche.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/nancy.jpg" alt="" width="443" height="344" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nance and Lech</p></div>
<p>Nance was a fearless and tireless fighter for working people and for the rights of women.  Nance believed that social democracy was the most humane and therefore the most sensible form of Government.</p>
<p>Nance held that rapacious capitalism, unrestricted free trade with countries whose labour standards were beneath our own, were inherently unfair and so wrong.  She believed that organized labour always made a mistake when it did not directly engage in the political process. She was right.</p>
<p>Lightning wit made Nance a media ace for her side of the argument.</p>
<p>Nance was selfless in her devotion to social justice and neglected her health.</p>
<p>I spoke with her just hours before her passing, she was on oxygen and in obvious discomfort.  Yet she lit up with delight when she saw my daughter and asked for news of the New Democrats continuing advance in the provincial election.</p>
<p>The former Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador Danny Williams, a political foe, showed up at Carnell&#8217;s this afternoon to pay his respects.  He noted the passion and courage of her convictions and said she was a great Newfoundlander.  On that all agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/10/my-aunt-nancy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back in the day</title>
		<link>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/09/back-in-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/09/back-in-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwardriche.com/?p=665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re. the link: While it persists my colonial outrage is not so acute these days. And not too long after I was giving the forgiving David Milligan grief The Great Eastern went to air on CBC Radio &#8211; for five years. I did another radio pilot, &#8220;24 Hour Duplication&#8221; featuring Andy Jones and Barry Newhook [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re. the link: While it persists my colonial outrage is not so acute these days.</p>
<div id="attachment_671" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 410px"><img class="size-full wp-image-671" title="berlin_wall" src="http://www.edwardriche.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/berlin_wall.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="250" /><p class="wp-caption-text">1989</p></div>
<p>And not too long after I was giving the forgiving David Milligan grief <a href="http://gporter.net/great/index.php">The Great Eastern</a> went to air on CBC Radio &#8211; for five years. I did another radio pilot, &#8220;24 Hour Duplication&#8221; featuring Andy Jones and Barry Newhook that went swimmingly and similarly disappeared into the bureaucracy. I&#8217;m going to see if I can&#8217;t find that one and post it, though it might be gone forever. Grateful for Mr. Milligan&#8217;s kind words here,</p>
<p><a href="http://gottausewords.com/?p=284">Link</a></p>
<p>Coincidentally my next book (working title, &#8220;Young Germans&#8221;) is set in 1989, and partially in St. John&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/09/back-in-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A letter from Robert Haas</title>
		<link>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/09/a-letter-from-robert-haas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/09/a-letter-from-robert-haas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwardriche.com/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Received a lovely note (with a correction) from Robert Haas of Tablas Creek Vineyards.  Mr. Haas was a gracious, learned and generous host one afternoon when I was in California doing research for Easy to Like. The photograph below is of the Tablas Creek Vineyards &#8230; yeah, it is that beautiful.  Hello Edward, I loved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Received a lovely note (with a correction) from Robert Haas of Tablas Creek Vineyards.  Mr. Haas was a gracious, learned and generous host one afternoon when I was in California doing research for Easy to Like. The photograph below is of the Tablas Creek Vineyards &#8230; yeah, it is that beautiful.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong> Hello Edward,</strong><br />
<strong> I loved &#8220;Easy to Like&#8221;.  I appreciated  the satire.  I do not think that we are quite so idealistically pure and demanding as Elliot: even as we become convinced that biodynamic and dry farming and native yeasts are more than just hype.  Nor, thankfully, has the wine press been unaware of what we are doing. The consumers and key gatekeepers in the trade, are becoming more diverse in their wine appreciation so that we can comfortably coexist with the runway wines, &#8220;factories&#8221; and the critter labels that do not share our ideology.</strong><br />
<strong> There is a mistake in your research that could be easily corrected in future versions, if any should be forthcoming.  Tablas Creek did, indeed, import &#8220;rootstocks,&#8221; but the important imports were the vinifera vine material to be grafted onto the phylloxera resistant rootstocks.  Mourvèdre, Grenache, Roussanne, etc. are vinifera material, or simply vines.  Rootstocks are 110R, 140R 1103, 3309, etc.  We imported them and started our own nursery because we were afraid that that we would have wasted three years of USDA importation procedures to get clean vines by having them infected by sending them for multiplication and grafting to U.S. nurseries with the then prevalent vine viruses here.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Best, Bob</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.tablascreek.com/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-655" title="tablas creek vermentino" src="http://www.edwardriche.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/tablas-creek-vermentino.jpg" alt="" width="350" height="263" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/09/a-letter-from-robert-haas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Close readers</title>
		<link>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/09/close-readers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/09/close-readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwardriche.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I said to a colleague in the film racket this weekend that 99% of the audience for most art and entertainment regard it as a forgettable diversion.  And there is nothing wrong with that.  I have the start-of-the-school-year cold right now and would kill for some great diversion.  Occasionally you have a reader or a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said to a colleague in the film racket this weekend that 99% of the audience for most art and entertainment regard it as a forgettable diversion.  And there is nothing wrong with that.  I have the start-of-the-school-year cold right now and would kill for some great diversion.  Occasionally you have a reader or a viewer or a listener that pays extra attention and finds things in your work that gave them meaning when you made them.  I don&#8217;t know this Angela Hickman but readers like her make it worth it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.booksunderskin.com/2011/09/easy-to-like.html">Link</a></p>
<p>It was more than 25 years ago but I studied that Restoration satire too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edwardriche.com/2011/09/close-readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

